Recommended Posts

Jus to give you some background info:

  • My Configuration: Core i7 920, Asus Rampage Extreme II, 6 GB G.Skill DDR3 1600 RAM, Kingstone HyperX 240 GB SSD
  • My motherboard only supports SATA II connections.
  • I purchased Kingstone HyperX SSD a few months ago. This drive is rated at around 500MB/s R/W
  • I was only getting speeds around 260 MB/s R/W through my mortherborads SATA II connection
  • Was looking for a controller card which was bootable, and could provide better speeds close to a SATA III connections

So after some research and playing around with a few controller cards, I finally purchased a SATA III controller card which is working like a charm for me !

Here is where I purchased this card: http://dx.com/p/2-po...sion-card-91095

It is only $15 dollars !

It is bootable, only adds a few seconds to the boot time and my SSD drive now hits 380MB/s at read and 350MB/s at write (way better than 260 MB/s R/W on a SATA II).

Here is some benchmarks I ran:

post-101831-0-48834900-1385622957_thumb.

I am curious to hear your opinion since many of the users purchasing a controller card to get better speed did not get what they where looking for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also came across a fairly new chip from Marvell.

Look up controller cards with Marvell 88SE9230. They employ PCI-E 2x v2.0 (which can transfer data as fast as 10Gb/s). This will result the card to fully support the SATA III speeds which is 6Gb/s max.

This one has the Marvell 88SE9230 on board :

http://www.newegg.ca...N82E16816124056

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

See the general discussion concerning "upstream bandwidth"

and comparing PCIe 1.0, PCIe 2.0 and PCIe 3.0 chipsets, here:

http://forums.storagereview.com/index.php/topic/36213-ioswitch-raijin-m2-pcie-ssd-thoughts/

Also, our Presentation to the Storage Developer Conference

last year in Santa Clara, California, advocated 2 key improvements

to the next "SATA-IV" standard:

8 GHz transmission clock

-and-

128b/130b "jumbo frames"

Both are already implemented in the PCIe 3.0 specification:

http://www.pcisig.com/news_room/faqs/pcie3.0_faq/#EQ3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now