HughR

Member
  • Content Count

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About HughR

  • Rank
    Member
  1. That's really useful to know. I use Linux. I assume that there must be settings somewhere for how patient the driver should be but I don't know where they are. Quite true. When there is no redundancy (i.e. no RAID or degraded RAID), TLER should be turned off. One would hope that the RAID controller (firmware or software) would be smart enough to do this. But during normal running of a RAID system, TLER is definitely a plus. I would expect that it would reduce the duration horrible latency bursts that might affect other parts of the computer system.
  2. This is a great thread. Very useful to me. That was the original name. And that was the original point: take cheap and nasty low end drives and synthesize a system which has performance characteristics (bandwidth and reliability) of higher cost drives. At the time there were several tiers of disks with limited crossover: at least PC (ST506 evolving towards IDE), workstation (SCSI), departmental, and data centre. It is fair to say that in 25 years circumstances have changed. But the point you are trying to quibble with is bang on. The lack of TLER in consumer drives is clearly intended to create market segmentation. I cannot imagine any marginal cost in adding the feature to firmware. If the market were really competitive, then every manufacturer would offer it in their consumer drives.