• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


danwat1234 last won the day on November 4 2013

danwat1234 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

3 Neutral

About danwat1234

  • Rank
  1. Since they have been doing the study for 6+ years now, I'm curious what the percentage of failure rates are for 5, 6, etc year old 24/7 spinning consumer drives are. https://www.extremetech.com/computing/170748-how-long-do-hard-drives-actually-live-for <--- 2013 article
  2. Seagate Mobile HDD Review Discussion

    How many platters? SMR? If 2 1TB platters, hey let's get on with a 3TB 9.5mm drive!
  3. HGST Travelstar 7K1000 Review Discussion

    I wonder if the Western Digital / Hitachi Scorpio Black 1TB drive WD10JPLX is a rebadged Travelstar 7K1000.. Probably so.
  4. It takes 12V not just 5V for chips?
  5. How has the specification adopted SMR and what were the goals of that? More efficiency/speed with writes to an SMR drive somehow and reporting of potential performance degradation?
  6. So,.. 2 platters at 1000GB/platter? That's quite a jump from the 667GB/platter Samsung M9T 2TB or 750GB/platter Toshiba MQ03ABB300. Hope they make a 3TB 3 platter 9.5mm and a 4TB 12.5mm drive too and 64GB NAND hybrid models of each! Does this use HaMR or SMR or just traditional PMR? It's quite a jump, gotta be more density/area than the 1.2TB/platter of the WD 6TB green drive for instance.
  7. Laptops are used as the primary computers for a lot of people. We can use external drives but more capacity internal to the laptop is welcome. Some high end laptops have m.2 SSD slots and also a mechanical drive bay. I see a M9T 2TB for $75, new, free shipping on Ebay right now and usually about $95. Cheap too. A lot of laptops you can't configure from the factory with this drive even. EDIT:You could argue that with desktop PCs and external 3.5" drives, that there really isn't any demand for larger drives their too, because 6TB is enough. But that space will still grow from helium/SMR and later, HaMR after the server market even if most people don't need it. So why not laptop drives too. First the external 2.5" 4 platter ones, then the 9.5mm 3 platter ones and 1 platter 5mm and 2 platter 7mm ones. EDIT: Also amazing laptop manufacturers like Lenovo and others still don't allow this drive as an option from the factory. "Up to 1TB" blah blah
  8. Pretty amazing, 2 years later, still WD and others have not made a 2TB 9.5mm 2.5" hard drive to match this drive.
  9. 10.8 watts at idle, 16.3 watts when operating. That is unlikely for both 5V and 12V to combine to that amount of power/waste heat at the same time for any length of time. Using Helium, it's supposed to be quit energy efficient. 7 platters PMR+SMR+helium
  10. Wonder if you can put in a Samsung M9T 2TB drive in the SATA slot.
  11. Crucial BX200 SSD Review Discussion

    The pricing isn't that great. Go on Ebay, good deals on higher-end SSDs. I think I saw a 480GB 850 EVO for only $20 more than the 500GB Crucial on Amazon
  12. WD Black 6TB HDD Review Discussion

    September; Has anyone tested the read access times of the 6TB Caviar Black? It's interesting to compare the ~5 year old Caviar Black 2TB Storagereview review to this and the 2TB does better on the database/file/web server/workstation tests but is clobbered by the 6TB in the real world HTPC bench and the 6TB has the same performance on 4KB random transfers read as the 2TB but (the 2TB) a bit slower on write. I will guess that the 6TB doesn't have quite the access time performance as the 2TB did of about 12ms (really good). Edit 10/26; John M who reviewed this drive on 10/7/2015 on Newegg says HD tune pro says the access time is 12.2ms. Way, way better than my crappy Seagate ST6000DX000 7200RPM 6TB drive that shows about 17.5ms with the same test! http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822236970&SortField=0&SummaryType=0&PageSize=10&SelectedRating=-1&VideoOnlyMark=False&IsFeedbackTab=true#scrollFullInfo
  13. WD My Book Pro Review Discussion

    Average access times of these 6TB WD Blacks?
  14. Has anyone test the average access time for this Enterprise drive or the ST6000DX000 desktop drive version of this? I am getting an access time of about 17.5ms on HD Tune Pro with the desktop drive, versus about 12ms on a Caviar Black 2TB. Not good at all. But the File benchmark and benchmark (STR test) it does very well on. Also, the drive parks it's heads in under 30 seconds of idle time and it takes at least 1 full second for the drive to begin to fulfill requests when the heads are parked because it does some sort of initialization almost every time! I can disable the Advanced Power Management (APM) every time the drive is plugged in, but that is annoying.