• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Enot

  • Rank
  1. Read what exactly is written on WD website. This is not "temperature of the disks".
  2. Enot

    SR's 250 GB Drive Roundup

    About NCQ. According to your IOMeter results (http://www.storagereview.com/articles/200601/250_iometer.png) and results from other sites, SIL controller dont make command reordering. When queue depth increase from 1 to 32 there is no any increase in perfomance for non NCQ HDDs. So non NCQ HDDs results are incorrect in IOMeter and partly for others tests. According to this (http://www.behardware.com/art/imprimer/624/), most NCQ HDDs reorder command not better than controller. In other words, they have "fake" NCQ.
  3. Enot


    This is ABSOLUTLY not true. Look on this http://www.overclockers.ru/news/newsitem.s...4&id=1074586553
  4. Enot

    What archiving program do you use?

    http://www.overclockers.ru/news/newsitem.s...4&id=1074586553 http://www.maximumcompression.com
  5. I get several personal traces with evalution version of IPEAK SPT 3.0. When I analyse my trace of Winbench99 in AnalysTrace I see that average queue length is more than 2. In MiscStat there are unreal values: Data Read 10000 Mb Data Written 16000 Mb In RawTraceFile there are many record with lengh 4095 sector. I have Win2000RUS Sp4, WD400JB attached to nForce2 IDE. What is wrong?