imsabbel

Member
  • Content count

    329
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About imsabbel

  • Rank
    Member

Contact Methods

  • ICQ
    0
  1. For me on my computer? Maximum access latency. Seriously. With STR, ALL are more than fast enough. Same for read IOPS. Whats left is maximum latency: If the computer is blocked for a second because of some stupid write-io lag, than you notice it more than anything else. As long as there are no big blocking latencies, even 50 Write IOPS are fine on the desktop
  2. If your power really was just the usage of the atoms, this would potentially even be interesting. But if you compare an Atom cluster with something in the line of a low power quad core, you get the following picture: For the raw power of one Core2 quad, you need at least 8 atoms. Those themself dont use that much power, but you needs a chipset for each, a nic for each (one GBit Port needs about as much power as the atom itself), etc.
  3. at you calling yourself a poweruser. If all you do is some zipping and virus scans, maybe you should just order whats right now cheapest @ dell...
  4. Well, the problem kinda is that currently, no SSD has any possibility of knowing what free space to consolidate. As it is not FS-aware, all it can do is shuffle data around, not knowing if its full or empty. Thats why Fusion-IO is only really fast if you reserve part of the space as "always empty". Future driver / OSes will address this, though.
  5. Quite a feat, considering that you can only buy them for 4 months now. But yeah, they stayed expensive, because they can afford to be expensive. SLC performance == SLC price. Other SSDs otoh steadily approach the spotmarket price of flash, which has stabilized after the huuuuge drop a year ago. The combination of the initally large margins dropping, and the flash price collapse caused the enormous price drop SSDS had tha last 18 motnh. Considering that memory companies are right at the edge of collapse even with the current prices, and no golden bullets are in sight, this is at an end for the moment. I think it will take some time before the $1/Gbyte barrier for flash will be broken (i.e. not this year)
  6. Only 5W when writing...but this is a 5400 rpm drive Yeah. But i think i wouldnt care. My current F1 will be (excluding premature failure) my last non SSD system/program drive. And for media storage, evven 1500rpm would be more than enough Ah, and one thing i noticed: those 5.4k drives have not much lower spin-on currents than the 7.2k drives. As they only have half the energy in the platters, this should mean that they wake up much quicker from sleep, right?
  7. Well, it seems that after that F1 fiasco (how long did it take from announcement to delivery?), Samsung now took the opposit approach: Take a look here: http://geizhals.eu/a387810.html You can buy the 500Gbyte ecogreen F2 single disk drive now, its on stock at several of the biggest vendors. Anybody got one, or info when the inevidable 1.5Gbyte Samsung drive will arive then?
  8. 1) It does not matter how many slots you have free in your tower. Many (if not most) things that would kill One raid 5 would also destroy the second in the same tower (think of fire, cathastrophic PSU failure, theft). 2) This means you need a seconds box anyway, so I would either suggest a NAS, or a second computer with you backup to regularily on the network. (NO mirroring. If its transparent, its also transparent to errors and no backup). 3) no tabe. Reasons: a) practiability: A robot seems to be way outside your budget, if you worry about slots in your case. You wouldnt like switching takes any more than switching HDs. price: if you dont want to work yourself silly, you would need 800Gbyte tapes. The cheapest LTO-4 drives i see around here are a bit above 1500€. Add to this 50€ per tape (thats about the same price as a 750Gbyte HD). For the money of even the cheapest tape drive, at current prices you could build a computer with 2 4TB raid 5s (2* 4 Seagate 1.5Tbyte raid 5, 2* highpoint 2310) to alternate snapshots. Just to give some perspective. For me, i also have a big raid, but i do not consider it 1 piece of storage. I have snapshotted online-backup for the most important 20-40Gbyte, keep a 2nd copy of the the "would be a hassle to rescan/digitize" stuff on external HDs (1 Tbyte or so), and the rest is just temporary stuff (uncompressed datasets, evaluation stuff) that can be recreated in about the same time as restoring an external backup would take, so no point in it.
  9. HM. I see 2 8GB sticks together here for 1.5k€. http://geizhals.eu/?cat=ramddr2regecc&xf=253_16384 4GB Modules are below 45€ nowadays, if you dont want the fastest speeds: http://geizhals.eu/?cat=ramddr2&xf=253_4096~256_1x So your 40Gbyte ramdrive would be at least... 500€? Doesnt sound that expensive, only twice the $/Gbyte than an intel SSD...
  10. STR doesnt matter nowadays. Nobody is buing velocirators because of it, at least.
  11. While i could imgine limits in theory (signal reflection delay times, etc.), i do not think that SATA is susceptible for them. Sata in notebooks often runs over just a few cm of film cables, and the mobile chipsets use (more or less) the same drivers than the desktop ones do.
  12. That has this to do with anything?
  13. I would really like some REAL benchmarks from a neutral source. While i appreciate the link in the OP, a page which proclaims itself as the sole distributed of the reviewed product doesnt really readiate credibility.
  14. The german C't magazin is testing MLC currently (and has been for some time). They stated they use a cheap 2GB USB stick with high transfer rate to archive lots of complete writes (the 2GB is to make sure it used recent MLC chips, and not some old crap). They do a complete write, read, and md5 hash comparison. Currently, the el cheapo stick is at >20k cycles, and not a bit lost yet. Its getting a cycle every 6 minutes, so lets see when it will fail... (And yeah, they showed that even cheap USB drives have wear leveling, as 10s of millions of writes to the "same" sector didnt do any damage)
  15. Are you for real? Seriously, everything better than a USB stick has relocation blocks. IIRC, the much hated OSC core drives have >1Gbyte of them. And even if a bit would fail without any kind of relocation possibility, there would just be a bad sector on your SSD.