Ender17

Member
  • Content count

    93
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Ender17

  • Rank
    Member

Contact Methods

  • ICQ
    0
  1. But newer WD10EACS (rev. 00D6B0) have 3 platters too. So, ist cache size the only difference? I didn't realize that...thanks for pointing that out. Is there a way (ie, with software) to determine if a drive has 3 platters or 4? I'm curious which models I have but don't want to open up all the computers. v1 WD10EACS-32ZJB0 v2 WD10EACS-00ZJB0 v3 WD10EACS-00D6B0 00D6B0 is 3 platters
  2. Solid State Drives - what to buy ?

    Thanks, I'm not just in it for the buzz factor. I want it if I will get real improved performance and load times. I see that OCZ are coming out witha much cheaper SSD in 128 GB - we're talking $350-$450 for a 128 GB OCZ SSD..... These prices are acceptable to me. I still will buy the WD Velociraptor 300GB for data storage and pics and an 1TB external HD for music & files. Thanks stay away from those OCZ drives check out the new Intel SSDs http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel...doc.aspx?i=3403
  3. I'm going to get one of the new 7K200 drives for my laptop, but I'm not sure what size to get. I don't need 200GB of storage, 120GB or so would be plenty, but would there be a decrease in performance?
  4. so it worked for you, just had the exclamation marks in Device Manager?
  5. Using RAID1 to improve desktop performance

    That's cool and all, but boot partitions are usually <512MB. All that they need to hold are your kernel(s) and initrd, bootloader, and system map. Do you really want 4 drives doing this? Frank by boot partition I mean the partition for Windows XP so I would make it about 30GB and also one for Vista which would be around 50GB any comments on expected performance compared to RAID1 or RAID0?
  6. Using RAID1 to improve desktop performance

    so what about RAID10? how do you think it would compare to RAID1 or RAID0? thinking of an Areca 1210 with 4 x WD360ADFD as boot partition
  7. I have 5 x Seagate 7200.10 320 GB in Raid 5 on my Promise EX8350 Raid controller. I´m getting around 130-140 mb/s. You should try to see if there is any new drivers/bios/firmware out for your Raid card, as its the limiting factor. OK, thanks for the reply. Can you post a HD Tach scan? Is it a nice smooth line?
  8. Everything works fine in RAID0
  9. Anyone using Seagate 7200.10 drives in RAID5? What am I doing wrong? Controller is BC4852 my new 8 x Seagate 7200.10 320GB compare to my old 4 x Western Digital WD3200JD RAID5
  10. your post was so long I'm not exactly sure what you're looking for, but for a cheap case with lots of room, how about a stacker? here are some pics with the supermicro hotswap cages - they're really expensive, almost as much as the case itself you would be better off just buying two stackers and using the 4 in 3 coolermaster cages http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1029165498&postcount=84
  11. great article as always Eugene
  12. ok, I got a firmware upgrade from Seagate for my 300GB drives flashed all of them, but performance is still way below what it should be setup is 4 disk RAID5 on BC4852 4 x Seagate 300GB RAID5 blue = 3AAH red = 3AAE 4 x WD3200JD RAID5 1 x Seagate 300GB, no RAID all 4 drives have similiar scans in single mode
  13. Highpoint 2320 RAID5 Information

    You could take a look over here. It's a Dutch website but as you can see they have a lot of benchmark results for the RR2320. Thanks. I also found some info here: http://forums.2cpu.com/showpost.php?p=637773&postcount=5
  14. Anyone with a Highpoint 2320 RAID5 array check in here. Here is the info I'm looking for: 1) HD Tach Tests 2) Read/Write Performance 3) What disks you're using 4) Number of disks 5) Rebuilt time 6) Comments and your overall opinion of the card Thanks
  15. I picked up a couple of 7200.9 160GB drives for a RAID-0 array to play around with. I'm getting disappointing performance from the Silicon Image 3114 controller on my Asus A8N Premium board: Should I try the NV RAID? Ideas on why this is so slow?