I've just got a 7200.7 parallel interface, and noticed in the performance database that the SATA version is about 25% quicker!
I know this is a silly question when the numbers are on the screen, but is the SATA version really faster?
Surely that's because it's a new drive that hasn't had many reliabilty reviews entered yet. Other drives such as the WD's and Seagates will have more reviews.
I think the reliabilty survey needs more than superficial analysis to be useful.