DogEared

Member
  • Content Count

    265
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DogEared


  1. As much as I would like to say "It's just marketing," the bits per second speed is correct since the interface is *serial* -- one bit follows the other.

    I don't recall rating my RS-232 port in bytes / sec. :P

    [Wow... maybe we should go back to baud... ]

    I still think 3 Giga on a box will attract more attention that 300 Mega, especially when the Giga is emphasized as 'cool'.

    Hmmm.... Gigacool . . .

    DogEared


  2. Simple answer: SCSI.

    The interface is faster and the 15k SCSI drives rule the raw performance charts.

    Now.....

    Which is faster?

    A 2005 Dodge Viper or my 2001 F-150?

    Well that's easy... my F-150.

    Sounds insane. What?! The F-150!?!!11111

    Since I am usually limited to 80 mph on the interstate highway, I can go over 600 miles in my truck (and have done so) without refueling. I can only go about 350 miles in that Viper, before I need to stop for fuel.

    If you drive near the speed limit, the Viper is a poor decision.

    What if I want 5 people to go with me on my trip? Viper or F-150?

    Well, you would need to travel 9 times the distance in the Viper (4.5 round trips)

    The F-150 is still faster.

    If you live in a congested city, which is more important? 0-60mph time or idle time?

    5 seconds to 60 mph? Or the engine needs to run for 5 hours?

    So... faster how? ;)

    Gaming? Office use? Video Editing (Uncompressed real-time)?

    By the raw numbers (e.g. 'torque', 'horsepower', etc.) the winner is SCSI.

    But why waste money on a Viper, when a Prius works better for *you*?


  3. Hmmmm.  Perhaps it's some kind of natural selection.  Keeps geeks from breeding :D

    HA!

    How would you all have liked to have been involved in that study?

    "You want to stick that where?" :blink:

    "Is that a thermocouple in your pants, or are you just happy to see me?" :lol:

    I would be more concerned about burning the "scrotal insulator" like that one poor guy.


  4.   It's just politics as usual.

    Agreed!

    The rest will sound like I'm defending Bush. I suppose I am. Not because I'm a fan, but he's gotten a really raw deal.

    The only reason I plan on voting for him this time, is the Democrats still haven't found anyone with charisma, or that can tell a joke for that matter.

    And Bush's dereliction of duty is okay?  His neglect for the state of our security during his first 8 months in office?  His lying to the American public about our reasoning to go to war with Iraq?  His complete and utter mishandling of the aftermath of the war?  His decision to pursue a personal vendetta in ousting Saddam rather than pumping any serious effort into finding Osama Bin Laden?

    What dereliction? Is it any more solid than the attacks on Kerry?

    Neglect? How? Was it any different than his predecessor?

    (Besides Pres. Clinton admitted dodged the draft. Nobody cared.)

    Lying? If the information you based a decision on is wrong (false) did you lie? Or were you mislead with everyone else? Seriously. Not making excuses.

    Besides, the President of the United States CANNOT DECLARE WAR!

    He can mobilize troops, can *commit an act of war,* but he does not have the power to declare war.

    The Congress and Senate declared war on Iraq. They had equal access to intelligence. Why are we not holding Kerry and his cronies responsible?

    Hell, I don't care if Kerry slept with Jane whats-her-face, or if Bush got his daddy to give him a 'permission slip' to avoid Vietnam.  I want a leader who will actually protect America, but promoting a positive image of the U.S. internationally.

    To me, how well someone sticks to their marital vows tells me how much their word is worth. They take an oath of office. If a guy cannot abide by simple monogamy, what good is his oath? (Hint: It's not worth anything.)

    And Kerry will protect us better than Bush? Are you going by what he says?

    Kerry has "changed" his mind many times about thses issues. What makes you think this is his real opinion?

    Who is going to tell him what to do and when to do it?

    What Bush has done has endangered the American public more than just 'letting well enough alone' would have done.  The goodwill of the world after 9/11 has been squandered.  One-time close allys have been doing everything in their power to stop our warmongering and chaos.  Do you think North Korea would be as eager to prove they have nukes if Bush hadn't called them part of the 'Axis of Evil'?  No.  If we actually TRY to peacefully change the world, who knows, it might work!

    Oh come on. I was getting spit on in Canada prior to delcaring war or "9/11."

    Arrogant american? Hmmm, I was wearing a t-shirt with an U.S. Flag on it.

    Like the world didn't want to see the U.S. drop off the earth years ago.

      Tell me about how Kerry's plan to revive the economy is flawed, tell me how his CURRENT actions make him unfit for command,

    Unfit? Indecision? I can't follow someone that cannot make up their own mind.

    And his plan for the economy is what Pres. Clinton used.

    Everyone blames Bush for the economy, HOWEVER, the economy started sagging in 2Q99 -- TWO YEARS before Bush took office. Hmmmmmm

    So, my opinion is "been there, done that, don't want to go back."

    tell me why his plans for international cooperation won't work. /QUOTE]

    No country will buy in without getting something in return. Contracts, oil guarantees, etc. Kinda what started the whole falling out in the first place.

    BTW, the U.S. and few allies have been fighting in Iraq for over 10 years. We never left. Air supression to prevent retalliation against segments of Iraq, has been in progress since the first war.

    Maybe Bush's priority was to end the war.

    Either way, we are finished there, so Kerry saying he will bring troops home is really moot. Either candidate will have majority of troops home by next spring.

    I have yet to see two *valid* candidates in a presidential election (since 1976 - my first involvement). I'm actually wishing Ross Perot would run again!!

    :lol:

    Screwed by the system yet again.


  5. It's just politics as usual.

    And Bush's dereliction of duty is okay?  His neglect for the state of our security during his first 8 months in office?  His lying to the American public about our reasoning to go to war with Iraq?  His complete and utter mishandling of the aftermath of the war?  His decision to pursue a personal vendetta in ousting Saddam rather than pumping any serious effort into finding Osama Bin Laden?

    Our president has committed acts that have been declared illegal by the secretary general of the U.N., while president, and we're worried about what the other guy did 30 years ago, and has since stopped supporting?  Why not just call Bush an alcoholic, whose binges make him unfit for the presidency.  (Never mind that he went clean over a decade ago.)

    Hell, I don't care if Kerry slept with Jane whats-her-face, or if Bush got his daddy to give him a 'permission slip' to avoid Vietnam.  I want a leader who will actually protect America, but promoting a positive image of the U.S. internationally.  What Bush has done has endangered the American public more than just 'letting well enough alone' would have done.  The goodwill of the world after 9/11 has been squandered.  One-time close allys have been doing everything in their power to stop our warmongering and chaos.  Do you think North Korea would be as eager to prove they have nukes if Bush hadn't called them part of the 'Axis of Evil'?  No.  If we actually TRY to peacefully change the world, who knows, it might work!

    Come on, Mustafa, at least present some real arguments, rather than just linking or quoting heavily biased sources.  Tell me about how Kerry's plan to revive the economy is flawed, tell me how his CURRENT actions make him unfit for command, tell me why his plans for international cooperation won't work.  You do that, and I'll take your points seriously.  I'm not going to point you to any Air America diatribes, or MoveOn.org ads, because I know that they are just as biased to the left, and adept in stretching the truth as Rush Limbaugh and the Swiftboat Vets are.

    Agreed!


  6. My wife bought a ML-1710 a couple of weeks ago -- no parallel interface - USB only.

    The ML-1750 is the bigger brother.

    BestBuy.com is selling the ML-1710 for 199.99 w/ a $120 rebate.

    Yep, $80 for a 17-ppm 600dpi laser.

    And, as stated, the toner is cheap.

    Haven't run through too many sheets (< 500) so far, but it's a nice little unit.

    Dogeared

    (I used part of the rebate to buy a wireless USB print server from Trendware. Pretty cool.)


  7. But has anyone seen this then:

    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=14590

    According to this article HP is insisting on recieving 32 bit Athlon64 cpu's not to confuse their costumers!!

    That is GREAT! HA!

    Although it seemingly contradicts the "95% of all laptops" article, at least someone recognizes very few people *need* 64-bit...and since 64-bit Windows is not shipping, why bother?

    HPaq *could* include the 64-bit chips and just not promote their "64-bitness."

    Man...if AMD actually does this I'll take back all of the good things I've been thinking about them in the last year or so.

    How much of AMD's business goes to HP? Or is AMD trying to buy into the Itanium market?

    BTW, the original article most definitely is talking about laptops. The entire article is about laptops. No other products are mentioned. How could anyone construe anything else?

    Dogeared


  8. N.B. I also think we should go back to  not allowing advertising of prescription drugs to the general public.

    I don't mind the advertisements - at least the ones that tell you what the drug is for - but I can live out the litany of side effects. :)

    My favorite side effect is "decreased lung function." What is that? Failure to breath? :lol:

    The lady on TV tells me to ask my doctor about PMDD and see if the drug is right for me. So I do. And my doctor informs me since I'm a male, I cannot have PMDD. TO which I reply..."Yeah, but I can still be affected by it." :rimshot:

    (Yes, I really did ask.. :) )

    Social programs account for a tremendous amount of money, but in an election year it all about Social Security. Baby Boomers are close to retirement and *highly* concerned about getting their money out of the system.

    And on the drug issue, here in Illinois we're about to legalize the purchase of drugs from Canada. In fact a few of the Senate candidates have taken old folks up to Canada to get their drugs. HA!

    Just wait until the drug companies make Canadians pay more since folks from the U.S. are buying in Canada. *sigh*

    (Merck and GlaxoWellcom(?) have already stated that this is exactly what they will do.)

    The retirement age should be raised to 70, but where do you draw the line in the workforce? All of those over 50 can retire at 65 and those under at 70? 67-1/2?

    Hmmmmm....

    And please be careful about taxing the rich. I was in that category a couple years ago, and it wasn't the "ton" of money that people think.

    Increasing taxes in the top bracket will push the "lower upper class" back into the "upper middle class". While the wealthy have enough cash and investments to stay ahead of the curve.

    My retirement plan has two options: both kids are 5 right now. :)

    Wishing we could implement a truly flat tax,

    Dogeared

    8^)


  9. Western Digital 120GB 7200RPM SATA Hard Drive, Model WD1200JD, OEM Drive Only

    So...no. You will not receive *any* cables with this purchase.

    I have not received any cables with other "drive only" purchases.

    Retail packages would include cables.

    This drive also comes with a "standard" 4-pin Molex connector as well as the SATA power (according to the documentation on WD's site)

    Looks like all you need is a SATA data cable.

    Dogeared

    8^)


  10. ...massive funds going to your military.

    That's my real social security. :P

    Not some slush fund the government raids when it needs more cash.

    Who would willing put their money into a fund that returned 1.5-1.75% / year?

    Unfortunately there are trillions of dollars locked up in the industries that surround social security programs.

    So many things are broken (and wrong) with the Social Security system, including how it is payed out. Someone needs to put a stake in it.

    Give me some credit. Let me save for my own retirement. WW II is been over for a long time.

    Dogeared


  11. Base config is: 2.4 Celeron, 256MB RAM & 40 GB HDD. No CD, No sound, Integrated graphics

    You did say business, right? :)

    IBM A30 (819955U) w/ 17" Monitor & 500VA UPS = ~$800

    you can add $130 for 3-year on-site service.

    DELL OptiPlex SX170 w/ 17" Monitor & 500VA UPSA = 780

    you can add $100 for 3-year on-site service

    In quanity you can get some deals. Moreso from IBM than Dell.

    Since you already have Outlook, I would install Open Office.

    I *greatly* prefer OO over MS Office.

    I have only found a couple compatibility problems between OO and Office XP: images within tables, etc. Kind of obscure issues for a "standard" office environment

    Also, what is there to future proof in an office machine? Additional memory slots?

    Are you handling the service and / or installation?

    It's funny that the few guys that I know that handle small businesses, just tell the customers what Dell equipment to buy and the guys handle the install and network setup.

    So much more money is made from the service contracts, that it is not worth the time to build it themselves.

    In the time it takes to put together a system (what about an hour on average?) that "guy" could have been on-site at $150-200 / hour (installation).

    Standard service is double that amount.

    If Windows was not a requirement, then you could build good machines for under $450.

    Dogeared

    8^)


  12. As much fun as this stuff is to read (really it is), doesn't NAS vs SAN boil down to presentation (purpose)?

    NAS presented as a shared file system via a "thin server".

    SAN presented as a disk-equivalent volume.

    Again, iSCSI will be both, although I believe it is targeted at the SAN market.

    Basicallly, replace Fibre with iSCSI in the SAN model and you have a less expensive infrastructure or a faster/quicker infrastructure due to 10Gbit Ethernet.

    A lot of what is identified with SANs would be handled in the software (or handled in firmware with a client/thin server model).

    Intriguing to say the least.

    Sorry to hear about the communcation problems (human & electronic) on the SAN maintenance,

    Dogeared

    8^)


  13. Interesting turn of events in this article.  To quote the first line:

    California's attorney general predicted on Monday that the courts would shortly bar same-sex marriages in San Francisco and invalidate the thousands of gay marriages the city has sanctioned over the past two weeks.

    As it should be. Same sex marriages in California are *illegal*.

    Everyone is so happy to be married, and within a month their marriages will be invalidated. Sad.

    Of course, if the folks aren't bright enough to know that the marriage license says "State of California" on it... well I can only feel pity that they think the Mayor of S.F. is the Governor.

    A local municipality *cannot* override laws of the State.

    Ironically, a State law *can* override the Federal law. States have precedence. Penalities for doing so may range from lack of Federal funding to being kicked out of the union.

    I like a sound bite I heard from the mayor of San Francisco. He said he was willing to make a stand for Gay-rights even if it cost him his job or career.

    HA! Pretty brave standing up for Gay rights *in* San Francisco. Sounds like someone wants to get re-elected.

    I honestly believe if gay marriages are legal, then churches will be forced to perform weddings for same-sex couples.

    You don't think someone will sue so they can be married at a particular Cathedral?

    I'd have to give on civil unions only because so many things (as mentioned above) are tied to legal unions.

    This is a stretch for me since I believe homosexuality is a perversion. And in case you think me insensitive, I include *any* sexual activity outside of a marriage (between a man and a woman) to be wrong in the same respect.

    For the record, I *did* try to organize a heterosexual parade in Seattle. I was flatly denied and told if I tried to hold such an event I would be jailed.

    Of course, the Gay Rights parades had been going for a few years before that time.

    Hmmmm.

    How come I cannot promote *my* lifestyle?

    Why is "reverse discrimination" different than "discrimination?"

    Everyone is feels discrimination except for the very rich... and they have their own problems.

    I've been turned down by the United Negro College Fund - I'm "White." - denied and told to leave them alone. I said "Hey! I thought racial discrimination is illegal?"

    I tried to join "Women's Workout World" - I'm a male. Denied membership.

    The Ku Klux Klan can hold a parade in my town, but my church cannot: "We don't want to offend people."

    I'd say the homosexuals need a Milllion Man march... but how many males are counted as "men?" How many of the females? :P

    Dogeared

    8^)


  14. A guy over at Sudhian found this:  http://www.buffalotech.com/wireless/produc.../HDH120LAN.html

    Not fancy, but should do what you want.

    U.S. Robotics has a similar product. No wireless, however.

    It does include Firewire, but with a lack of GbE you wouldn't notice the difference - unless you used two drives at once. :)

    I don't know of any low-cost units that offer that kind of flexibility (RAID 10, 50, etc.) and offer GbE.

    Building your own in a mid-tower seems the way to go.

    In other news...

    I find it interesting how SANs are fixated on Fibre now. I found that article intriquing and mostly correct. I didn't see where those guys found their information for SANs though.

    They seemed focused on the host adapter as a means of differentiating the two. It really is based on the purpose and framework of the actual storage.

    In reality it boils down to marketing,

    Dogeared

    8^)


  15. I think this would make a great little app server.

    The EIDE ports should be attached directly to the I/O Hub (according to AMD's documentation), whereas the SATA would connect to the PCI bus. I agree that this setup is ironic.

    So, if you use PATA and the GibE this little guy would cruise.

    With SATA, you would get 60MB/sec with your GibE and 50MB/s with your drive.

    Still not bad.

    I kinda like this little guy. Put a x48 in it, load it with 4GB of RAM and you've got a powerful app server - i.e. cheap blade-concept system

    The six PCI slots baffle me, but other than that it fits a popular niche in the market.

    Cool.

    Dogeared

    8^)


  16. Are you sure it is not the media?

    Can you test the drive directly connected to an ATA port?

    I had read in several places (a short while ago) that most media did not do well at 8x and caused error correction to kick in.

    As I recall, 5x to 6x was typical of these discs.

    It's worth checking out unless you know the discs can really burn at 8x. From what I have been told, you can get a DVD to burn at 8x once in a while, but it's not typical depending on brand and type of disc.

    Dogeared

    8^)


  17. I'd agree with page file on the system disk (windows) and PS Scratch on the other.

    You load your programs once. And with sufficient RAM (512MB?) you will not hit your page file right away, i.e. paging while opening apps is unlikely for normal desktop use.

    However, it can be easy to hit the page file *and* PS Scratch every time you perform a task on an image.

    Therefore keeping the page file from using the Scratch disk is better performance over all.

    Ideally you would have 3 or 4 disks.... :)

    I plan on using this setup when my 7k250 arrives,

    Dogeared

    8^)


  18. ... would I get the full performance of this disk or I need a board integrated SATA controller to get its full performance??
    You will get almost all of the performance from this drive depending on what else is on the PCI bus.

    You will *not* get the 150MB/sec burst transfers (mabye 110MB/sec), the *sustained* transfer rate will be around 50-55MB/sec (see Performance Database) Hardly overwhelming your PCI bus. Actually it's about half of your actual PCI bandwidth.

    A very effecient 100Base-T network card could eat the other half.

    If you have few (or no) additional expansion cards go for it. You will get 95%+ of the Raptor's capabilities. You will get still get the great access times and speed.

    For burst speeds you would need integrated ports or a PCI-X SATA card (w/ suitable motherboard).

    Dogeared

    8^)


  19. Eh. I don't see the big deal.

    Respected "traditional" publications have OpEd writers on staff that produce articles daily/weekly.

    The author is stating an opinion. If Intel is willing to introduce x86-64 chips just to steal business from AMD, who knows what eles it would do. :)

    When Tom ran the site and wrote/edited the content, it was *very* good.

    Now he's got a bunch of twenty-somethings (maybe thirty-somethings) writing about things with which they have no experience. Pop-culture.

    Anand uses Flash for his graphics so his site is useless to me. :D He keeps referring to charts that I can't see.

    (Doing away with Flash has cut so much crap from my web browsing. It really is amazing.)

    Back to the IDF:

    If I was the Itanium Project Chief, I'd be irritated too. Instead of doing what is best for *all* of Intel, Intel has stomped on it's "competition." I really don't know why Intel bothers with AMD.

    Not the brightest move for Intel in the long term, but confuses things enough in the short term to buy time. F.U.D.

    I can only imagine that Sun and IBM have created fear at Intel,

    Dogeared

    8^)


  20. I'm not familiar with the 74GB Raptor sales. Has it really taken off?

    I don't think it has. Actually I think Raptor sales prove the opposite point: very few will pay a premium price. Would not Western digital rather attract *one* top PC manufacturer than the *entire* enthusiest market?

    For example I recently bought a Hitachi 250GB 7k250 for ~$150US. I paid $105US for a 36GB Raptor when they first came out. Why would I pay $250 for a 74GB drive?

    Is the Raptor worth 6x the cost of a 7k250? *shrug*

    Market penetration:

    I went shopping at the 1st Tier PC / Server sellers.

    Only Dell (workstations) and Gateway (more limited) offered SCSI and Raptors in the Same space. However most systems that offered 7200rpm drives offered one or the other Raptor.

    Let's say about a dozen systems offered Raptors and SCSI drives. Compare that to the hundreds of SCSI-based servers for sale. Clearly the money for such a drive is the true server market.

    Would you pay $400 (let's assume it will be cheap) for a 2.5" 73GB drive?

    I don't think that would fly in the desktop market.

    I don't think it's elitism...it think it's realism. It is a difference between drives that are meant to run 24/7 under load and drives that are meant be idle most of the time - or even "off."

    Not enough people will pay for the Savvio in the IDE-based Market. If Seagate decides to lose money and create a new market, fine. But they won't get their money back in a typical product lifecycle.

    Besides my experiment with "Enterprise" IDE (36GB Raptor) is reporting bad blocks. Something I have know I have not experienced since the Barracuda debuted (the last one I remember was my "30MB" RLL drive before I moved to SCSI).

    Regarding controller cards for SCSI:

    It is the same as ATA. When you want to take advantage of a new hard drive you: 1) live with the slower speed of your motherboard's connector; or 2) buy a new controller card.

    What's the difference? Seems to be the same with SCSI.

    For example:

    My U320 drives still works on my Adaptec 2940. Actually I can use my U320 drive on an Adaptec 2940U (Ultra SCSI) with little to no performance loss (80MB/sec) - what is that card now about 8-9 years old?. And they work fine on the U160 card I bought 3-4 years ago with no performance loss.

    How is that different than people with ATA133 drives with ATA100 motherboards?

    I will agree that cost when you *choose* to upgrade is bigger issue with SCSI. But do you really have to upgrade every time you buy a new drive?

    Maybe WD just resurrected the Enterprise name for their lineup and didn't mean "Enterprise" performance,

    Dogeared

    8^)


  21. And for the record it is not because you believe in god or whatever, that you are an idiot, but you are vulnerable....in the mind.

    More explanation please.... I'm curious. I really have to laugh when I hear/see "Belief in God" and "weak mind" in the same context.

    I find it hilarious that 20th (now 21st) century man is the best, brightest, most intellectual in history. The Mayans have been gone for how long and their calendar system is still accurate - without this leap year nonsense.

    We are discovering that Egyptians electroplated gold thousands of years ago - they used wet cell batteries and capacitors. They also had a short-range wired messaging system. *Long* before the Telegraph.

    As I recall, items that may have been used as piezo-electric speakers have been found in digs (gold and bronze plates with "interesting" residue).

    Chinese folks had rockets and wired communcations thousands of years before the Industrial revolution of the Western (Eurocentric) world.

    Sidetracked there a bit....

    The Bible holds many names for God. The two most common are probably: Elohiym and Jehovah.

    It should not be a surprise that Jewish texts contain alot from Sumeria since the orginal Hebrews came from Sumeria.

    Personally, I am not aware of the Torah speaking of "gods", in reference to the God of Abraham (formerly known as Abram ;) )

    I have always been baffled by the statement: The God of Christianity is not the God of Judaeism. Seems pretty clear to me.

    History is a fascinating thing, but modern history can be flawed due to lack of written/documented ancient history.

    But hey, nVidia claims to have made the first GPU and AMD/Apple thinks they mad the first 64-bit desktop. That proves people cannot even go back 10 years to discover the truth. :D

    Finally, regarding learning about God firsthand.

    Good in theory but not always good in practice. Remember God killed people for touching his stuff after he told them not to. He didn't say "Um, dude, what did I say?" God ordered the elimination of people that did not believe in/on him.

    Plenty is said about the good side of God, but people "forget" that God is eternal and *never* changing. This is the same God that gets angry, jealous, etc.

    So, it would be best to learn some things second hand. HA!

    Anti-religion & pro-faith,

    Dogeared

    8^)