• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


reader50 last won the day on December 14 2016

reader50 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

3 Neutral

About reader50

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

4065 profile views
  1. From retail drive pictures, the WD Gold appear to be rebranded HGST He drives.
  2. HGST does have a 12TB enterprise drive out, currently running $630 on ebay. I've yet to see it in the regular channels. Look for HGST He12 If you are looking for large economical storage, drives in the 6-8 TB range are approaching half the price-per-TB of that He12. A RAID array in a NAS would get you more storage, and probably at a lower price. Admittedly with more noise.
  3. You posted your thread in the right place.
  4. I find myself in agreement.
  5. It's been 15 months now, still no sign of a 3 TB drive in 9.5mm. Unless I want to drop $1500 on a 4TB SSD. I didn't think it would take this long for an upgrade to appear. Larger drives used to appear like clockwork.
  6. 16 levels of analog voltage per cell. It better have amazing error check and correction. I won't be the first one to try this. Side note, between higher bits-per-cell and 3D layouts, the bits-per-chip has gone up dramatically. I was expecting SSD prices to decline dramatically as density goes up. But they've stayed about the same (or even increased slightly) over the past year. What gives? The manufacturers can't all be in a conspiracy to prop up prices, can they?
  7. Any special reason why you're commenting on a 3-year-old article? You do realize some of these models most likely aren't made any more? SSDs are evolving quickly - models rarely stay on the market for years. Also, prices have come down. Who is going to consider a 200 GB drive for 870 EU when you can buy a (slower SATA-III) 2 TB SSD for $550 today?
  8. BackBlaze makes their raw data file available for download. You should be able to extract that data with a bit of scripting.
  9. According to the specs sheet downloadable from here, the IronWolf NAS 10TB is 7200 RPM. 4TB and smaller are 5900 RPM. Performance plateaus at 210 MB/s sustained for 7-10TB. It could be a limitation of the controller. I'd still be interested in a direct measurement. If the RPM were 5900 after all ... now there would be a story. Of course, SR might have trouble getting Seagate samples for awhile if you happened to break such a hypothetical story ...
  10. Interesting comparison. Toshiba 8TB, 7200 RPM WD Red 10TB, 5400 RPM Seagate IW 10TB, 7200 RPM I can see why the Toshiba would generally outperform the WD - higher RPM is overcoming the size difference. The more puzzling aspect is why the Toshiba edged out the IronWolf. Seagate's drive is the same RPM as well as larger. At least according to the specs. Did you run an acoustic check on the Seagate for primary frequency, or do a rotational latency check, to measure the actual RPM? If the Seagate were at 5900 RPM, the results would make a lot more sense. btw - this story gives the WD Red as 7200 RPM. But the actual Red review gives it as 5400.
  11. The HGST 12TB drives have appeared on eBay. US seller. Going around $700 each.
  12. There are only 4 brands making 3.5" drives today, so "top 3" is probably not useful. Here they are, more-or-less in order of reliability based on recent BackBlaze stats. HGST (owned by WD, consistently highest reliability) Toshiba (small BackBlaze pool, so stats show higher variability) Seagate (2nd largest, seems to have upped their quality the last couple years) Western Digital (largest one, seems to have become less attentive to quality lately)
  13. I read daily. Mostly reply on HD news, which isn't as frequent as we'd like. Bring on HAMR.
  14. The 03 or 04 part is the series number, it gives an indication of density and possibly power efficiency. Toshiba's 05 series has just hit the markets, with 04 still going strong. 03 is an older design today. I don't know what the G or D stands for.