Jump to content


Photo

Partition does not start on physical sector boundary.

SSD partitioning error

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Rizwan

Rizwan

    Member

  • Member
  • 2 posts

Posted 09 May 2014 - 06:02 AM

Hi,

 

I have SSD of size 480 GB and I have made a one partition of it. After making the single partition, when I tried 'fdisk -l' command, I am seeing the following output.

 

 fdisk -l

Disk /dev/sda: 480.1 GB, 480103981056 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 58369 cylinders, total 937703088 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1               1   937697984   468848992   83  Linux
Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary.
 

 

The error "Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary." is also displayed.

It seems to be strange. I have tried paritioning the SSD to four partitions but still the same error is repeating for other partititons as well.

 

Can any one help me on this. Thanks in advance


#2 Kdawgca

Kdawgca

    Modinator

  • Mod
  • 640 posts

Posted 11 May 2014 - 05:39 PM

Start 1 makes me think you need to use fdisk with compatibility options. Try fdisk -c -u


Storagereview.com on Twitter
SSD vs. HDD Guide

  • MSI H81M-E33 V2 - Haswell Intel Pentium G3220+ 60GB Vertex 2 / 500 GB HDD/6GB/EVGA 9600GSO/ Windows 7 + VMs//Dell Latitude D410 -1.6ghz Pentium M, 120GB IDE HDD, 2 GB DDR ram.

#3 Rizwan

Rizwan

    Member

  • Member
  • 2 posts

Posted 13 May 2014 - 10:58 AM

Hi Kdawgca,

 

Thank you for the reply.

 

Using 'fdisk -c -u' have no luck.

 

If you can observe the output of 'fdisk -l' which I have provided earlier shows

 

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes

 

Here the 'logical' sector size is 512 bytes and physical sector size is 4096 bytes. Whether this will have any impact.

 

Any idea whether we need to pass any options while formatting the disk either with 'fdisk' or 'sfdisk'.

 

Please help me. Thanks in advance.


#4 Kdawgca

Kdawgca

    Modinator

  • Mod
  • 640 posts

Posted 14 May 2014 - 02:03 AM

Hmm...give -lu a shot and see if it reports the same as -cu.

 

If it is a tool reporting issue, then you will want to find the most up to date tool/package....between fdisk/sfdisk and even cfdisk(supposedly less errors) IDK. I have always used gparted but mainly used it for other partition needs.

 

Alignment is the key here, but AFAIK the alignment looks fine as far as I can tell. 1*512/8(some use 512 other use 4096 but it is all a multiple of 8) = 64 which is an integer so you should be fine.  Look into partition alignment and advance formats 4k, if you want to learn more as I am far from an expert. There might be a better way to check it depending on the distro.

 

If you want to try something then 1) try the below alignment method and 2) check the tools to see if they report anything different.

 

http://lifehacker.co...ive-performance


Storagereview.com on Twitter
SSD vs. HDD Guide

  • MSI H81M-E33 V2 - Haswell Intel Pentium G3220+ 60GB Vertex 2 / 500 GB HDD/6GB/EVGA 9600GSO/ Windows 7 + VMs//Dell Latitude D410 -1.6ghz Pentium M, 120GB IDE HDD, 2 GB DDR ram.



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users