Jump to content


Photo

2.5" vs 3.5" reliability


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 msec

msec

    Member

  • Member
  • 1 posts

Posted 23 July 2013 - 11:22 AM

I'm looking to buy a couple of external drives for backups/archiving and reliability is the most important factor me. Is there a wide margin in terms of reliability between 2.5" and 3.5" drives?

Also, does the orientation of the drive play any part in its performance (for instance placed flat vs on its side like a book on shelf)?

TIA

#2 FastMHz

FastMHz

    Member

  • Member
  • 400 posts

Posted 24 July 2013 - 09:59 AM

3.5" drives are much more easily damaged by shock and sudden movement while spinning as they're intended to be stationary. 2.5" drives can withstand much more, so are a better choice for an external box, however capacity tops out much lower.

Orientation has no effect on modern hard drive performance.

Production: Vishera 8350/32gb RAM/Dual SSD/VelociRaptor/Radeon 7750
Gaming: Phenom II 955/16gb RAM/SSD/VelociRaptor/Radeon 7950
Retro: K6-2 550/256mb RAM/160gb HDD/CompactFlash/3DFX/ATI AIW Pro/SB16/DB50XG
http://www.fastmhz.com

#3 schaki

schaki

    Member

  • Member
  • 20 posts

Posted 24 July 2013 - 10:01 AM

2.5" should be more reliable as these are designed to be used in laptops. Problem with heat is also less of a problem even with my former Hitachi Travelstar 7k100 IDE, which as the model name tell is a 7200 rpm drive. Had that drive mounted in a slimmed noname magnesium or aluminium cabinet for quite some time before I let it replace an other drive in an older laptop.
Even modern 2.5" 7200 rpm drives however like the 1tb Travelstar 7k1000 seems to lag behind the better 3.5" 2tb drives which I've had a look at not long ago. http://storagereview...r_7k1000_review
If you are interested in 3.5" then there is at least two writeup which might be of interest. 2TB http://reybasti.hubp...-Drive-For-2013 Worth to mention which he not did is that the 2TB Barracuda only have one year warranty.
And the 3TB http://reybasti.hubp...-Drive-for-2013

#4 jtsn

jtsn

    Member

  • Member
  • 93 posts

Posted 29 July 2013 - 08:48 PM

For external drives ALWAYS go with 2.5in. They are way more reliable than 3.5in. And they don't need separate power supplies.

#5 Mr.Diego

Mr.Diego

    Member

  • Member
  • 3 posts

Posted 27 September 2013 - 02:12 PM

The 3.5 may give you more space for your dollar, but in the long run, the 2.5 will last you longer, and be an overall better buy. Like FastMHZ said, the 2.5 can withstand alot more than the 3.5. Another plus is the 2.5 is normally a lot quieter.



1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users