Jump to content


Photo

Poll: Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB vs. Samsung 840 120GB to buy?


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

Poll: Poll: Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB vs. Samsung 840 120GB to buy? (4 member(s) have cast votes)

Which one to buy?

  1. Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB (2 votes [50.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

  2. Samsung 840 120GB (2 votes [50.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 bricker

bricker

    Member

  • Member
  • 8 posts

Posted 03 March 2013 - 12:55 PM

First: http://www.hardocp.c...b_ssd_review/10
Second: http://www.hardocp.c...b_ssd_review/10

The question is which one would you buy for the same price? These two are a good value I can buy now. It!s not an option to buy a 60 GB drive for the same price or a 3rd brand for much more money.

Edited by bricker, 03 March 2013 - 12:58 PM.

#2 Kdawgca

Kdawgca

    Modinator

  • Mod
  • 632 posts

Posted 04 March 2013 - 02:09 AM

Samsung 840 should be 100% Samsung components and it should have the Samsung Macgician software(nice little information tool), so that would be my choice.

What will you use the SSD for?

Storagereview.com on Twitter
SSD vs. HDD Guide

  • MSI H81M-E33 V2 - Haswell Intel Pentium G3220+ 60GB Vertex 2 / 500 GB HDD/6GB/EVGA 9600GSO/ Windows 7 + VMs//Dell Latitude D410 -1.6ghz Pentium M, 120GB IDE HDD, 2 GB DDR ram.

#3 bricker

bricker

    Member

  • Member
  • 8 posts

Posted 04 March 2013 - 08:49 AM

I'd use the SSD in an old notebook for a standalone drive for light office use. Also, did you see the tests? They say this specific Samsung model is much inferior to the Kingston one.

#4 Kdawgca

Kdawgca

    Modinator

  • Mod
  • 632 posts

Posted 04 March 2013 - 09:19 PM

I'd use the SSD in an old notebook for a standalone drive for light office use. Also, did you see the tests? They say this specific Samsung model is much inferior to the Kingston one.

For most users, low access times are important. All SSDs should have very low access time which means faster bootup, and faster application/file loading. Latency etc that they tested may just be a fluke, firmware issue and it may not be noticeable to the average user. Unless the system pauses/freezes, I wouldn't worry.

Note: make sure to keep backups and make sure the the drive has a warranty. Some stores also might have a return policy, which could come in handy.

Storagereview.com on Twitter
SSD vs. HDD Guide

  • MSI H81M-E33 V2 - Haswell Intel Pentium G3220+ 60GB Vertex 2 / 500 GB HDD/6GB/EVGA 9600GSO/ Windows 7 + VMs//Dell Latitude D410 -1.6ghz Pentium M, 120GB IDE HDD, 2 GB DDR ram.

#5 Brian

Brian

    SR Admin

  • Admin
  • 5,080 posts

Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:49 AM

Setting aside the protocol of coming to our site and linking only to inferior reviews ;) ...

I'd agree that the Samsung is the choice, it's a good drive, has a great software suite to manage the drive and Samsung offers very good support.

Brian

Publisher- StorageReview.com
Twitter - @StorageReview

 

#6 bricker

bricker

    Member

  • Member
  • 8 posts

Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:59 AM

Setting aside the protocol of coming to our site and linking only to inferior reviews ;) ...

Feel free to review both drives on your site. This was the only comparison I have found reviewing both drives from the same source.

By the way Samsung offers TCL chips for Kingston's MCL for the same price. Both drives comes with a 3 year warranty and for both support equals a replacement if faulty. Perhaps you have an experience with Kingston not replacing a faulty drive under warranty when Samsung does? My common sense says I rather pay the same price for MLC instead of TLC + Samsung's software.

#7 dietrc70

dietrc70

    Member

  • Member
  • 104 posts

Posted 06 March 2013 - 04:54 AM

The Samsung 120GB 840 Pro is often available for a good price and would be my recommendation.

#8 stjg

stjg

    Member

  • Member
  • 22 posts

Posted 06 March 2013 - 05:23 AM

If the 840 pro is the same praice or slightly higher I would prefer that, but with the non pro version using TLC I am not convinced. At the moment I have an good ole 5000 cycle SSD, that was replaced once and that was a hazzle. If Samsung replaces the 840 three times without a problem, it would be three times the hazzle.

#9 bricker

bricker

    Member

  • Member
  • 8 posts

Posted 06 March 2013 - 06:54 AM

The Pro costs exactly 1.5 times more than the non-Pro in this part of the world. Anyways, I'm a consumer, I don't need Pro features for Pro price. So it's either one of the two drives in the OP.

#10 Valleyforge

Valleyforge

    Member

  • Member
  • 108 posts

Posted 07 March 2013 - 04:25 AM

I prefer my Kingston V+200 over my Samsung 830 drives. There's little performance difference as I can tell, and the Kingston is cheaper. The Kingston has never had, or needed a firmware update - it just plain works.

Considering the faulty firmware on the early 840 drives, I think I'd stay clear.

Laptop: Dell inspiron E7440, 8GB RAM, 480GB Crucial M500 mSATA, Win7 Pro
Workstation: Homebrew i3-4350, 16GB, 256GB Crucial M4, 3TB Barracuda XT, Win8.1 Pro

NAS: Synology DSM5 running on Sempron 3850, 4GB, Micron C400 265GB & 2x4TB HGST NAS

HTPC:TranquilPC ABEL H2, i3-4010U, 4GB, 64GB Crucial M4 mSATA, Win7 Pro

HTPC 2: Pentium G620 on DH61AG in Antec Euler, 4GB, 120GB Kingston V+200, Win7 Pro


 

#11 bricker

bricker

    Member

  • Member
  • 8 posts

Posted 18 March 2013 - 09:10 AM

Went with the Kingston. So far so good.



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users