Storage Forums: [ASK] Hard Drive for NAS - Storage Forums

Jump to content

Advertisement

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

[ASK] Hard Drive for NAS comparison: which HD is better

#1 User is offline   teitolindo 

  • Member
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 24-January 13

Posted 24 January 2013 - 04:23 AM

Good day!

this is my 1st post so Hello World! :)

few days ago I was really shocked by the poor performance of WD Caviar Green 1Tb (i tested them using dd and find out they have performance equal to 5400rpm Hitachi "somedisk"..)

i decided to give them back and now im lookin' for different class.

i know they are all good BUT I would ask you what's' the best choice among the following:

SEAGATE - Constellation ES 1 Tb Sata 6 Gb / s 3,5" Buffer 64 Mb 7200 Rpm
SEAGATE - Barracuda 7200.14 1 TB Sata 6 Gb / s 3,5" Buffer 64 Mb 7200 rpm
WESTERN DIGITAL - WD Black 1 TB Sata III 6 Gb / s 3,5" Buffer 64 Mb 7200 rpm

I'm not an expert so i hope you can help me.

bye! :D


If you would like to remove this advertisement, please register.

#2 User is offline   s_a_r99 

  • Member
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 23-December 02

Posted 24 January 2013 - 09:56 PM

If the drives are going into a NAS box, the WD RED drives are you best choice for the $. They are designed for NAS applications. Yes, they spin at 5x00 rpm, but in a NAS environment going to a 7200 rpm drive gives no appreciable performance increase.

#3 User is offline   teitolindo 

  • Member
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 24-January 13

Posted 01 February 2013 - 05:39 AM

View Posts_a_r99, on 24 January 2013 - 09:56 PM, said:

If the drives are going into a NAS box, the WD RED drives are you best choice for the $. They are designed for NAS applications. Yes, they spin at 5x00 rpm, but in a NAS environment going to a 7200 rpm drive gives no appreciable performance increase.


Thanks for your replay,

i don't have $ problem and i have a gigabit nas, i really don't need those wd red.. i think they are like caviar green.. i want a 7200 rpm not 5*00.

thanks anyway! :)

#4 User is offline   IanKen 

  • Member
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 24-February 13

Posted 24 February 2013 - 02:56 AM

View Postteitolindo, on 01 February 2013 - 05:39 AM, said:

Thanks for your replay,

i don't have $ problem and i have a gigabit nas, i really don't need those wd red.. i think they are like caviar green.. i want a 7200 rpm not 5*00.

thanks anyway! :)


Well if money is not an issue then just get any flavor of enterprise class disk.

And FWIW, in a decent NAS even the 5400 units will saturate a gigabit link. I run five Samsung HD204UI 5400RPM units on an Areca 1230 controller in a 2K8 server and I can easily stomp the network bandwidth. The disks are not a bottle neck.

#5 User is offline   dietrc70 

  • Member
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 69
  • Joined: 06-June 06

Posted 24 February 2013 - 10:52 PM

If you think the Reds wouldn't be fast enough then I recommend the WD RE series. They cost more, but are extremely fast and like the Reds, are designed for 24/7 usage.

#6 User is online   Brian 

  • SR Admin
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 4,071
  • Joined: 29-December 09

Posted 25 February 2013 - 09:15 AM

7200 RPM drives in a NAS add performance but there are few use cases that justify it, especially compared to the power use, thermals, etc. In our small NAS reviews (under 8 bays) we test with Reds and 4TB Ultrastars and while there is a significant performance difference, the "felt performance" is similar.
Brian

Publisher- StorageReview.com
Twitter - @StorageReview

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users