Jump to content


Photo

2TB Western Digital My Passport Portable Hard Drive Review Discussion


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Kevin OBrien

Kevin OBrien

    StorageReview Editor

  • Admin
  • 1,475 posts

Posted 26 March 2012 - 11:31 AM

In this review we look at the 2TB Western Digital My Passport that uses a custom 2.5-inch 2TB hard drive inside.

2TB Western Digital My Passport Portable Hard Drive Review

#2 danwat1234

danwat1234

    Member

  • Member
  • 225 posts

Posted 26 March 2012 - 03:01 PM

I'm curious how the access time are with hdtach or whatever. Probably close to an average of 19ms.

#3 ChrisMcPole

ChrisMcPole

    Member

  • Member
  • 134 posts

Posted 26 March 2012 - 04:13 PM

Mighty ugly outside and rather thick :rolleyes: I would not trust it. 500GB with two platters is more secure that this multi-platter mess.

Edited by ChrisMcPole, 26 March 2012 - 04:13 PM.

#4 Brian

Brian

    SR Admin

  • Admin
  • 5,384 posts

Posted 27 March 2012 - 10:26 AM

Meh, in black it's pretty nice looking, I like the redesign of the My Passport family, though the Mac-oriented metal body is my favorite.

Brian

Publisher- StorageReview.com
Twitter - @StorageReview

 

#5 Kevin OBrien

Kevin OBrien

    StorageReview Editor

  • Admin
  • 1,475 posts

Posted 27 March 2012 - 10:37 AM

I'm curious how the access time are with hdtach or whatever. Probably close to an average of 19ms.


With IOMeter set to access the entire drive we measured an average 4K write latency of 10.59ms... read was in the 18.9ms range


Mighty ugly outside and rather thick :rolleyes: I would not trust it. 500GB with two platters is more secure that this multi-platter mess.


Well from an external view the drive isn't any larger than the 1TB model we reviewed previously. Yes the internal drive is larger, but the consumer buying it would never know unless they cracked it open. From a reliability perspective though, its a unique drive. WD did this for the 1.5TB solutions in the past, but as such a unique design its hard to gauge long term reliability since there are so few of these drives out there.

#6 [ETA]MrSpadge

[ETA]MrSpadge

    Member

  • Member
  • 755 posts

Posted 28 March 2012 - 02:39 PM

Wow, didn't I complain about the lack of such offerings just a few weeks ago?! :D

@Thick: of course it's got to be thicker than slim drives at this capacity point. It's way thinner than 2 standard drives or a 3.5" drive, though.

@Reliability: in 3.5" drives more platters do not neccessarily lead to higher failure rates. And you shouldn't trust any single drive anyway. You could even view it this way: having more read/write heads, the accesses are spread among more of them, so the load of individual ones is reduced. Sure, the spindle has to work harder, but this can be engineered for.

MrS

#7 Brian

Brian

    SR Admin

  • Admin
  • 5,384 posts

Posted 29 March 2012 - 07:54 AM

Well if you get really worried about data redundancy on the go, there's always this...we actually use it in RAID1 for one of our multiple offsite backups.

http://www.storagere...mus_mini_review

Brian

Publisher- StorageReview.com
Twitter - @StorageReview

 

#8 jameskatt

jameskatt

    Member

  • Member
  • 3 posts

Posted 12 August 2012 - 10:53 PM

My primary concern is the plastic case with no heat venting. These hard drives get very hot under constant use. Heat shortens their life tremendously.

This hard drive is only good for intermittent, short-duration use - such as daily backups - rather than daily continuous use. I would have preferred a metal body to improve heat dissipation - and some air vents.

My second concern is that the drive doesn't have a standard SATA connector. Thus, you cannot place the internal hard drive in a better case. You are stuck with its cheap plastic case.

Edited by jameskatt, 12 August 2012 - 10:55 PM.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users