Storage Forums: Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 Review Discussion - Storage Forums

Jump to content

Advertisement

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 Review Discussion

#1 User is online   Kevin OBrien 

  • StorageReview Editor
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 1,103
  • Joined: 26-March 06

Posted 28 November 2011 - 01:57 PM

USB drives are one of those things have a certain amount of commoditization to them now, most of us have several, some that we use and others that are long forgotten in desk drawers. But let's be clear about those USB drives and the Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 USB drive. The latter is not a commodity, it's a high performance USB drive that acts more like a portable SSD than those sluggish USB drives of old. The HyperX 3.0 is even faster than Kingston's previous generation USB 3.0 drives; thanks to eight-channel architecture the HyperX can pump out transfer rates of up to 255 MB/s read and 135 MB/s write.

Read Full Review


If you would like to remove this advertisement, please register.

#2 User is offline   ChrisMcPole 

  • Member
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 90
  • Joined: 06-September 11

Posted 28 November 2011 - 02:51 PM

The best usb drive on the planet?

#3 User is online   Kevin OBrien 

  • StorageReview Editor
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 1,103
  • Joined: 26-March 06

Posted 28 November 2011 - 03:00 PM

Well best thumbdrive we have reviewed so far ;)

#4 User is online   Brian 

  • SR Admin
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 4,071
  • Joined: 29-December 09

Posted 28 November 2011 - 03:21 PM

View PostKevin OBrien, on 28 November 2011 - 03:00 PM, said:

Well best thumbdrive we have reviewed so far ;)


Certainly. It's funny, other companies have recently released PR on fastest ever USB drives, but they're all four-channel. We'll see...consider USB 3.0 drives in the performance category part of SR's directive now to cover and review with vigor :)
Brian

Publisher- StorageReview.com
Twitter - @StorageReview

#5 User is offline   Nihility 

  • Member
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 28-February 11

Posted 28 November 2011 - 05:15 PM

What kind of controller do these thumb drives have?

Are they designed like SSDs or something completely different? Any onboard RAM?

It's really cool seeing such high speeds from small/mobile drives. Finally moving on from the days of USB 2.0.

$280 for 128 GB is still a bit too expensive for my taste :)

#6 User is online   Kdawgca 

  • Modinator
  • Group: Mod
  • Posts: 555
  • Joined: 18-March 11

Posted 28 November 2011 - 06:00 PM

View PostNihility, on 28 November 2011 - 05:15 PM, said:

What kind of controller do these thumb drives have?

Are they designed like SSDs or something completely different? Any onboard RAM?

It's really cool seeing such high speeds from small/mobile drives. Finally moving on from the days of USB 2.0.

$280 for 128 GB is still a bit too expensive for my taste :)

Yeah, it is very cool to see the speeds of these little things.

I wonder if that price includes a free replacement for lost drives? :D Even if it is not meant for typical usb flash drive "duties", it is still pretty small...
Storagereview.com on Twitter
SSD vs. HDD Guide

  • HP dc7700s-Pentium D 945+ 60GB Vertex 2 / 500 GB HDD/6GB/ATI 4350 lp/ Windows 7 + VMs//Dell Latitude D410 -1.6ghz Pentium M, 120GB IDE HDD, 2 GB DDR ram.

#7 User is online   Brian 

  • SR Admin
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 4,071
  • Joined: 29-December 09

Posted 29 November 2011 - 08:12 AM

View PostNihility, on 28 November 2011 - 05:15 PM, said:

What kind of controller do these thumb drives have?

Are they designed like SSDs or something completely different? Any onboard RAM?

It's really cool seeing such high speeds from small/mobile drives. Finally moving on from the days of USB 2.0.

$280 for 128 GB is still a bit too expensive for my taste :)


Not sure, that kind of info is readily available. Probably not any or much onboard RAM. We'll ask and see if Kingston will tell us.
Brian

Publisher- StorageReview.com
Twitter - @StorageReview

#8 User is offline   AFQ 

  • Member
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 11-December 11

Posted 11 December 2011 - 12:41 PM

I am sorry I've to bump up an old thread.

I've a little question, hat exactly do you mean by 8 channel architecture that is used in this drive? Please explain it a bit.

#9 User is online   Brian 

  • SR Admin
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 4,071
  • Joined: 29-December 09

Posted 11 December 2011 - 02:42 PM

Think of it similarly to the number of threads the processor can handle at once. 4 vs 8 is a big difference.
Brian

Publisher- StorageReview.com
Twitter - @StorageReview

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users