Storage Forums: RamDisk test - Storage Forums

Jump to content

Advertisement

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

RamDisk test New X79 bords comes 8 dimm slots + 8GB ram = cheap 56GB ramdisk

#11 User is offline   player-x 

  • Member
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: 22-December 04

Posted 06 February 2012 - 05:47 AM

View PostKevin OBrien, on 30 January 2012 - 12:55 AM, said:

Comparing them to SSD solutions though is a bit hard. They are way over the price per GB and working in different segments.

Why, sure a big ramdisk cost more.

But you get what you pay for, and €500 or $600 for 8x 8GB is certainly not out of reach of a lot of enthusiast, they even sell sets of 8x8 for enthusiast, i clearly remember paying something like around $600 for a UW SCSI card and one 4.5GB 7200rpm Quantum Atlas, and that was when money was still worth something!

So i think that's imho sort of a non argument, as anyone willing to build a real high end system can afford to get 32 or 64 GB of memory.
Sure it cost about 3x per GB as my 240GB RevoDrive 3 X2, but then its also way over 3x as fast.

And i not sure (dont know how hard it is to get review samples), but i think that there is a good chance that companies like Corsair or G.Skill cant waiting to send you a set for testing, as i think that they cant wait to sell these big kit's to enthusiast for RAMdisk use.
Because they are the only one's greasy enough to buy sets like these. :wacko:

And a good review from SR will certainly help them to consider it more.

I just got my self a 3930K system with 64GB of memory.

Now with 58GB of ram, of the 64GB, for use as a ramdisk, ware also a portion is used for the swapfile (usually around 2~5GB), i still have to often swap directories from HDD to RAM to HDD, even now with 64GB. (from the 48GB in a i7 970 system)

But even do its not perfect, its still a lot faster then any SSD, it just takes a bit of work making batch files for the programs you wane run on the RAMDisk.
But once you make a proper batch file, you can use it as a template for other programs.

I now have Fire Fox and Anti virus(200MB) always on and WoW (31GB) semi-permanently on the ramdisk, and i still have 27GB free for swapfile and other programs.

And Robocopy is really your friend if you want to make batch files, to swap files between RAM and storage and visa versa.

Why do i hope more users are getting ramdisk?

As with the more users, the better the ramdisk software becomes, and hope one day i dont hav eto make my own batch files anymore, And that there comes a ramdisk catch software solution, as i see that as the next step in faster storage systems.
like you now have with SSDs for hot data and HDD for cold data, as in the OCZ Hybrid and the LSI MegaRAID CacheCade

Are there disadvantages for using a RAMdisk, sure, you really like a UPS, if you live somewhere ware whit so so stable electricity like me, and also, you real don't like to turn off your PC anymore, but then, mine looks great, and has pretty lights in him. Posted Image

Posted Image

This post has been edited by player-x: 06 February 2012 - 05:53 AM



If you would like to remove this advertisement, please register.

#12 User is online   Brian 

  • SR Admin
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 3,629
  • Joined: 29-December 09

Posted 06 February 2012 - 09:34 AM

In our next 8x8GB ram disk review or the one after, we'll try to toss in benchmarks for a few 60GB SSDs we have on hand.
Brian

Publisher- StorageReview.com
Twitter - @StorageReview

#13 User is online   continuum 

  • Mod
  • Group: Mod
  • Posts: 3,013
  • Joined: 31-December 01

Posted 09 May 2012 - 03:07 PM

Could CPU usage be discussed as well? That's a main disadvantage I see with RAMdisks vs. harddisks and SSDs that instead can go over DMA.

For desktop apps I wouldn't see much difference but for server applications, the CPU hit could be significant.

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users