Storage Forums: New Seagate 1TB-platter drives. - Storage Forums

Jump to content

Advertisement

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

New Seagate 1TB-platter drives.

#1 User is offline   StorageTux 

  • Member
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 51
  • Joined: 18-March 10

Posted 20 August 2011 - 04:48 AM

There are new Seagate drives utilizing 1TB platters on the web and also in this Seagate document.

ST3000DM001 3.0TB 7200 3.5" Barracuda Internal Drive
ST2000DM001 2.0TB 7200 3.5" Barracuda Internal Drive
ST1000DM003 1.0TB 7200 3.5" Barracuda Internal Drive

More detailed spec are here:

Posted Image

source

Does anybody know the release date of these drives? Some shops on the web have already added them into the price lists.


If you would like to remove this advertisement, please register.

#2 User is online   Brian 

  • SR Admin
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 3,629
  • Joined: 29-December 09

Posted 22 August 2011 - 08:18 AM

I emailed Seagate last week asking when we'd see the 3TB 3 platter Barracuda. No release date yet...
Brian

Publisher- StorageReview.com
Twitter - @StorageReview

#3 User is offline   arklab 

  • Member
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 20
  • Joined: 30-December 01

Posted 11 November 2011 - 05:03 AM

Egad! I'm so glad I've stumbled on this post!

I just purchased a Seagate ST2000VX002 which on first comparison has identical specifications to the ST2000DM001 2.0TB - save for the rotational speed (5900 vs 7200) and intended use (standard vs video/surveillance).
My use is video storage in a HTPC only.

Looks like I may need to re-evaluate my decision.

#4 User is online   Brian 

  • SR Admin
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 3,629
  • Joined: 29-December 09

Posted 11 November 2011 - 09:25 AM

Maybe...this post it a little old, they have since announced the death of green drives and the 1TB platters are shipping in the Barracuda.
Brian

Publisher- StorageReview.com
Twitter - @StorageReview

#5 User is online   continuum 

  • Mod
  • Group: Mod
  • Posts: 3,013
  • Joined: 31-December 01

Posted 12 November 2011 - 01:43 PM

ST2000VX002 (Seagate SV35) are not the same platters-- per the spec sheet at least, the areal density is very different.

422 Gbit/in^2 for the SV35 listed here, vs. 625 Gbit/in^2 for the new Barracudas with 1TB platters.

Aside from the spindle speed differences and whatnot, the lower areal density will likely result in lower performance (even if everything else was equal-- obviously one key factor not in these spec sheet races is head performance).


http://www.seagate.c...tSpecifications

http://www.seagate.c...tSpecifications

#6 User is offline   Belmonte 

  • Member
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 14-November 11

Posted 14 November 2011 - 06:15 AM

I'm confused about the 2TB drive. In this table from Anandtech:
http://images.anandt....20.26%20AM.png

it says that the 2TB version has 3 platters, so it's not likely using 1TB platters. Then in the table from StorageTux, the table says 2 platters for the 2TB disk, but its weight is the same as the 3TB one, which uses 3 platters. According to that table, all the disks which are using 1 platter weigh the same.

Is the 2TB disk using actually 3 platters, or is there a mistake with the weight?

#7 User is online   continuum 

  • Mod
  • Group: Mod
  • Posts: 3,013
  • Joined: 31-December 01

Posted 15 November 2011 - 06:26 PM

The Seagate spec says the 2TB disk uses 3 platters, so it's probably using slightly lower-density platters. Mickey/doraemon or someone here (or on Ars Technica) explains it better.

As far as drive weight, manufacturers often generalize a bit on weights so it's harder to say what that means.

#8 User is offline   Mickey 

  • Group: Patron
  • Posts: 2,225
  • Joined: 29-December 01

Posted 15 November 2011 - 08:32 PM

As continuum said, it's likely that the 2TB that uses 3-disks is employing lower-density platters. It's not that different from what chip makers do, where they bin chips for speed/performance. Heads are treated the same way. Once built into drives, the manufacturer may discover that while the drive cannot reliably meet the highest target (e.g. 3TB), it may do just fine as a 2TB drive.

Of course, it may also be that whoever publishes the specs was lazy and just used the same value for all drives in the same "family." :P

#9 User is offline   DaGuru 

  • Member
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 28-November 11

Posted 28 November 2011 - 03:48 PM

THE DAY HAS COME... IT'S ON NEWEGG AS OF TODAY.

http://www.newegg.co...N82E16822148840

Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 1TB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive -Bare Drive
AVAILABLE TODAY on newegg. Searched this weekend and it wasn't there. Must have just arrived today :)

It's listed in the Newegg overview as "the Industries first 1TB-per-disk(aka platter)hard drive technology" drive so this is probably the one you've been waiting for. Rephrased, total size of Drive is 1TB with a single 1TB platter.
Buy it and let me know if it sucks or not before I buy it lolz ;)

This post has been edited by DaGuru: 28 November 2011 - 04:42 PM


#10 User is offline   TonyTech07 

  • Member
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 25-November 11

Posted 29 November 2011 - 01:22 AM

View PostDaGuru, on 28 November 2011 - 03:48 PM, said:

THE DAY HAS COME... IT'S ON NEWEGG AS OF TODAY.

http://www.newegg.co...N82E16822148840

Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 1TB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive -Bare Drive
AVAILABLE TODAY on newegg. Searched this weekend and it wasn't there. Must have just arrived today :)


It's been there at least since November 11th because that's the day I posted about the apparent discrepancy in the specifications for other drives in the Barracuda family, and the day I was researching components on NewEgg.

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users