Check your numbers - some of the read and write speeds seem to have been exchanged:
"The 60GB version has maximum read/write speeds of 250/110MB/s and the 120GB version ups the
read speed to 170MB/s." Surely that last "read" should be "write"?
And for the 512 GB drive:
"The company claims read and write speeds of 200MB/s and 240MB/s, respectively." - shouldn't read be faster than write?
Either way, I'm glad we're seeing SSD manufacturers use the 3.5" form factor to deliver higher capacities - though I would have thought it should be possible to fit more than twice the storage in a volume that's over
5 times that of a 9.5 mm high 2.5" SSD? Hexus says this is basically two 256 GB SSDs hidden in a 3.5" chassis, but is anyone planning to make a true 3.5" SSD? It should be easy to fit 1 TB + into that form factor, maybe even matching the 2 TB capacity of today's largest 3.5" hard disk drives. Of course the cost would be dizzying, but it would be nice to see capacity no longer an issue with SSDs, with cost the only barrier.
If I'm wrong, please tell me why. I'm trying to help, but I'm here to learn, too.
See
my profile for PC specs. I do not practise what I preach.