Storage Forums: Seagate NL35 - Storage Forums

Jump to content

Advertisement

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Seagate NL35

#1 User is offline   Eugene Icon

  • Administrator
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 1,057
  • Joined: 28-December 01

Posted 26 October 2005 - 10:03 AM

Industry leader Seagate Technology has lagged competitors in releasing a high-capacity, SATA-based products intended for use in the more demanding nearline enterprise environment. Now, however, the company feels that various factors have combined to create a more practical enterprise SATA market. Seagate's NL35 takes aim at the likes of Maxtor's MaXLine and WD's Caviar RE? How do its features and performance stack up? StorageReview examines!

Seagate NL35 Review


If you would like to remove this advertisement, please register.

#2 User is offline   whiic Icon

  • hauptsturmführer
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 921
  • Joined: 14-March 05

Posted 26 October 2005 - 10:24 AM

Quote

Hitachi Deskstar 7K400 (400 GB)
Same-generation desktop unit
If 7K400 is "same-generation" now, how could it have been "previous-generation" in older reviews?
Antec 1200 | HX520W | Commando | Q6600 G0 @ 3.15GHz | Noctua NH-U12F | 8GB of RAM | HD 4670 (passive)
7 TB of storage: 1x 1TB 1st gen GP, 1x 1TB 2nd gen GP, 1x 2TB 3rd gen GP, 1x 7200rpm F1, 2x 5400rpm F2 EcoGreen

#3 User is offline   Olaf van der Spek Icon

  • Member
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 1,958
  • Joined: 14-November 02

Posted 27 October 2005 - 04:51 PM

whiic, on Oct 26 2005, 04:24 PM, said:

Quote

Hitachi Deskstar 7K400 (400 GB)
Same-generation desktop unit
If 7K400 is "same-generation" now, how could it have been "previous-generation" in older reviews?
View Post

Isn't the NL35 based on the previous generation 7200.8?

#4 User is offline   whiic Icon

  • hauptsturmführer
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 921
  • Joined: 14-March 05

Posted 27 October 2005 - 05:07 PM

"Isn't the NL35 based on the previous generation 7200.8?"

Well, NL35 is a close relative to 7200.8 (and I never objected to that) but note that 7K400 is older generation drive than even the 7200.8. 7K400 was a "Previous-generation competing unit" when the 7200.8 was reviewed in the past. See SR's 7200.8 review.

This post has been edited by whiic: 27 October 2005 - 05:07 PM

Antec 1200 | HX520W | Commando | Q6600 G0 @ 3.15GHz | Noctua NH-U12F | 8GB of RAM | HD 4670 (passive)
7 TB of storage: 1x 1TB 1st gen GP, 1x 1TB 2nd gen GP, 1x 2TB 3rd gen GP, 1x 7200rpm F1, 2x 5400rpm F2 EcoGreen

#5 User is offline   Spod Icon

  • Guru > me > newbie
  • Group: Patron
  • Posts: 1,913
  • Joined: 06-November 02

Posted 31 October 2005 - 08:41 AM

End of page 3:

Quote

...and again leads there Barracuda by a 3 IOPs cushion.

Shouldn't that be "the" or "their"?

Also, wouldn't it be more useful to list the reliability survey results for the 7200.8? Assuming there have been enough samples to produce a rating.

First post in months, and I'm pedanting (is that a word?) an article!

Congrats on getting Testbed 4 off the ground and putting it to good use!

This post has been edited by Spod: 31 October 2005 - 08:42 AM

If I'm wrong, please tell me why. I'm trying to help, but I'm here to learn, too.
See my profile for PC specs. I do not practise what I preach.

#6 User is offline   whiic Icon

  • hauptsturmführer
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 921
  • Joined: 14-March 05

Posted 31 October 2005 - 12:04 PM

[joking]Maybe the percentile of 7200.8 (only 13%) is too terrible to mention for a fan of Seagate. That percentile is almost Maxtor-like. :D[/joking]

More seriously, maybe Eugene assumed that both 7200.8 and NL35 originated from 7200.7. For NL35, 7200.8 might be closer to a sibling than a parent. Well, I don't know. Was NL35 announced at the same time? Did they become available at the same time? etc.

Naming a single predecessor (even if the named drive is correctly chosen and not "randomly picked") for each drive is quite trivial IMHO.
Antec 1200 | HX520W | Commando | Q6600 G0 @ 3.15GHz | Noctua NH-U12F | 8GB of RAM | HD 4670 (passive)
7 TB of storage: 1x 1TB 1st gen GP, 1x 1TB 2nd gen GP, 1x 2TB 3rd gen GP, 1x 7200rpm F1, 2x 5400rpm F2 EcoGreen

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users